Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
Tumori ; 108(4): 394-396, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1477149

ABSTRACT

As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, radiation therapies have been modulated to reduce the risk of infection during outpatient activities and hypofractionated regimens or radiotherapy delay for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) were suggested. Hypofractionated radiotherapy not only may confer no disadvantage in regard to outcome when compared to a more protracted schedule but might also reduce the risk of infection. We report the experience of a dermatologic radiation therapy department concerning a group of patients with a diagnosis of NMSC selected for a radiation treatment plan aimed to minimize the number of their accesses to our department.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Pandemics , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Skin Neoplasms/radiotherapy
3.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 147(6): 1757-1761, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1287438

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) over 3 weeks has proved to be a safe and effective treatment for cutaneous T cell lymphomas (CTCL). In this prospective trial, we examined the feasibility of ultra-hypofractionated low-dose TSEBT regimen in two fractions with 4 Gy combined with systemic therapy to minimize the number of visits to radiation centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) received TSEBT with a total radiation dose of 8 Gy in two fractions between April 2020 and June 2020. Patient and treatment characteristics, tumor burden, the impact on the quality of life using Skindex-29 questionnaires, and acute toxicities were analyzed. RESULTS: During TSEBT, all patients developed grade 1 toxicities while two patients developed grade 2 toxicities. One patient experienced sepsis. The most common adverse effects were erythema and edema. All grade 2 toxicities regressed after 4 weeks following TSEBT. Based on the reported symptoms measured by Skindex-29, we detected a significant reduction in total Skindex-29 score after 8 weeks of radiation (P = 0.03), particularly in the symptoms (P = 0.01) and emotional domains (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Ultra-hypofractionated low-dose TSEBT followed by systemic therapy seems to be a safe and feasible alternative to conventional fractionated TSEBT for patients with MF/SS. The skin tumor burden and the health-related quality of life have been significantly improved within 8 weeks following radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Skin Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Mycosis Fungoides/complications , Mycosis Fungoides/radiotherapy , Quality of Life , Radiation Injuries/diagnosis , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects , Sezary Syndrome/complications , Sezary Syndrome/radiotherapy , Skin Neoplasms/complications , Treatment Outcome
5.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 110(4): 957-961, 2021 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1116868

ABSTRACT

Radiation recall phenomenon (RRP) is an uncommon, late occurring, acute inflammatory skin reaction that emerges in localized areas coincident with previously irradiated radiation therapy (RT) treatment fields. RRP has been known to be triggered by a number of chemotherapy agents. To the best of our knowledge, this report is the first description of RRP after administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for COVID-19, or any other currently available vaccine against COVID-19. Acute skin reactions were observed in 2 RT patients with differing timelines of RT and vaccinations. In both cases however, the RRP presented within days of the patient receiving the second dose of vaccine. For each RT course, the treatment planning dosimetry of the radiation fields was compared with the area of the observable RRP. RRP developed within the borders of treatment fields where prescription dose constraints were prioritized over skin sparing. Our observation is currently limited to 2 patients. The actual incidence of RRP in conjunction with Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine or any other vaccine against COVID-19 is unknown. For patients with cancer being treated with radiation with significant dose to skin, consideration should be given to the probability of RRP side effects from vaccinations against COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Immunization, Secondary/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiodermatitis/etiology , Sarcoma/radiotherapy , Skin Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Radiodermatitis/pathology , Radiosurgery/methods , Sarcoma/diagnostic imaging , Skin Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Cord Compression/surgery , Thoracic Wall
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL